Aspire Hosting Miami AMD EPYC 7662 VPS Deep Review: Geekbench 6 Over 4000, 4.6GB/s NVMe I/O & Global YABS Network Benchmark

Introduction: Clarifying Intel Xeon vs AMD EPYC Lineups

Aspire Hosting operates two distinct hardware architectures in their Miami, Florida (iM Critical) datacenter:

  1. Intel Xeon Gold 6248R Series: Engineered for high-RAM budget efficiency and general workloads.
  2. AMD EPYC 7662 Compute Series (Cloud Premium & EPYC Upgrade): Powered by enterprise Zen 2 Rome 64-core processors and backed by ultra-fast PCIe 4.0 NVMe solid-state arrays for demanding CPU and heavy I/O operations.

We analyzed the latest community YABS (Yet-Another-Bench-Script) benchmark output. This deep review provides complete performance metrics across CPU compute, Geekbench 6 scores, 4.6GB/s disk throughput, and global iperf3 network routing for this AMD EPYC 7662 (4 vCPU / 8GB RAM / NVMe) instance.


1. System Information & Environment

Detected system metrics confirm clean KVM virtualization, a modern Linux 7.0 kernel on Ubuntu 26.04, with hardware AES-NI and AMD-V virtualization extensions enabled:

Component / PropertyDetected ValueArchitecture Notes
ProcessorAMD EPYC 7662 64-Core ProcessorEnterprise Zen 2 Rome server flagship
vCPU Cores4 vCPUs @ 1996.249 MHzDedicated CPU scheduling with low steal
ExtensionsAES-NI ✔ / AMD-V ✔ EnabledFull hardware acceleration and nested virtualization
RAM7.7 GiB AvailableSupported by 2.0 GiB Swap space
Disk96.9 GiB (Partition /dev/vda1)High-speed enterprise PCIe 4.0 NVMe array
OS & KernelUbuntu 26.04 LTS / Kernel 7.0.0-30-genericContemporary Linux stack
Network ASNAS215030 AspireHostingNative Miami, Florida, US routing

2. Geekbench 6 Benchmark Results

On the standardized Geekbench 6 benchmark, the AMD EPYC 7662 demonstrates superior single-core efficiency and multi-core scalability:

{
  "title": { "text": "Geekbench 6 Benchmark Scores (AMD EPYC 7662 4 vCPUs)" },
  "tooltip": { "trigger": "axis" },
  "xAxis": { "type": "category", "data": ["Single-Core Score", "Multi-Core Score (4 vCPUs)"] },
  "yAxis": { "type": "value", "name": "Geekbench 6 Score" },
  "series": [{
    "name": "Score",
    "type": "bar",
    "data": [1308, 4085],
    "itemStyle": { "color": "#e53935" }
  }]
}

3. Storage I/O Benchmark (fio 50/50 Mixed R/W)

The storage array leverages enterprise PCIe NVMe SSDs. Under 50% read + 50% write mixed synthetic load, the drive produced exceptional throughput:

Block SizeMixed Read Speed (IOPS)Mixed Write Speed (IOPS)Total ThroughputOverall IOPS
4K Block270.99 MB/s (66.1k)271.70 MB/s (66.3k)542.70 MB/s132,400 IOPS
64K Block2.01 GB/s (30.8k)2.02 GB/s (30.9k)4.04 GB/s61,700 IOPS
512K Block2.25 GB/s (4.3k)2.37 GB/s (4.5k)4.63 GB/s8,800 IOPS
1M Block2.26 GB/s (2.1k)2.41 GB/s (2.3k)4.67 GB/s4,400 IOPS
{
  "title": { "text": "fio Mixed R/W Throughput Scaling (GB/s)" },
  "tooltip": { "trigger": "axis" },
  "xAxis": { "type": "category", "data": ["4K Mixed", "64K Mixed", "512K Mixed", "1M Sequential"] },
  "yAxis": { "type": "value", "name": "Throughput (GB/s)" },
  "series": [{
    "name": "Total Throughput",
    "type": "line",
    "data": [0.54, 4.04, 4.63, 4.67],
    "itemStyle": { "color": "#ff5722" },
    "areaStyle": { "color": "rgba(255, 87, 34, 0.2)" }
  }]
}

Storage Performance Highlights:

  • 132k IOPS on 4K: Eliminates database query queues and high-write bottlenecks.
  • 4.67 GB/s Peak Throughput: Over 9x faster than traditional SATA SSDs (~500MB/s), handling multi-gigabyte archives and heavy data transfers in seconds.

4. Network Performance & Global Routing (iperf3)

The 1Gbps uplink saturates line rate across North America, Europe, and South America:

Target LocationInterface LinkSend SpeedReceive SpeedPing Latency
New York, NY, US10G1.07 Gbits/sec934 Mbits/sec33.8 ms
Los Angeles, CA, US10G1.04 Gbits/sec914 Mbits/sec68.6 ms
London, UK10G1.00 Gbits/sec711 Mbits/sec100.0 ms
Amsterdam, NL100G993 Mbits/sec852 Mbits/sec115.0 ms
Sao Paulo, Brazil1G999 Mbits/sec890 Mbits/sec112.0 ms
Tashkent, Uzbekistan10G654 Mbits/sec453 Mbits/sec249.0 ms
Singapore10G74.2 Mbits/sec764 Mbits/sec263.0 ms
{
  "title": { "text": "iperf3 Global Throughput (Mbits/sec)" },
  "tooltip": { "trigger": "axis" },
  "legend": { "data": ["Send Speed", "Receive Speed"] },
  "xAxis": { "type": "category", "data": ["NYC", "LA", "London", "Amsterdam", "Sao Paulo", "Tashkent", "Singapore"] },
  "yAxis": { "type": "value", "name": "Mbps" },
  "series": [
    { "name": "Send Speed", "type": "bar", "data": [1070, 1040, 1000, 993, 999, 654, 74.2], "itemStyle": { "color": "#00bcd4" } },
    { "name": "Receive Speed", "type": "bar", "data": [934, 914, 711, 852, 890, 453, 764], "itemStyle": { "color": "#4caf50" } }
  ]
}

5. Architectural Comparison: Intel Xeon vs AMD EPYC

MetricIntel Xeon Gold 6248RAMD EPYC 7662Recommendation
CPU ArchitectureCascade Lake (24C/48T)Zen 2 Rome (64C/128T)AMD delivers higher multi-thread throughput
Geekbench 6 ScoreSingle ~960 / Multi ~3400Single 1308 / Multi 4085+25% to +40% compute increase
Storage TechnologyEnterprise SATA SSD (~560 MB/s)PCIe 4.0 NVMe (4.67 GB/s)9x faster I/O throughput
4K Random IOPS~38,000 IOPS~132,400 IOPSCritical for transactional databases
Target WorkloadHigh-RAM budget hostingHigh-performance productionChoose based on I/O & compute intensity

6. Final Verdict

The AMD EPYC 7662 Miami instance delivers top-tier hosting performance:

Recommended Scenarios: High-concurrency web services, relational database clusters (PostgreSQL/MySQL), CI/CD build nodes, and modded Minecraft servers.